CHOICE

connect

A publication of the Association of College and Research Libraries
A division of the American Library Association
Editorial Offices: 575 Main Street, Suite 300, Middletown, CT 06457-3445
Phone: (860) 347-6933
Fax: (860) 704-0465

FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

Please do not link to this page.

February 2015 Vol. 52 No. 6


Oxford University Press


The following review appeared in the February 2015 issue of CHOICE. The review is for your internal use only. Please review our Permission and Reprints Guidelines or email permissions@ala-choice.org.

Social & Behavioral Sciences
Political Science - Comparative Politics

52-3312
JN956
2013-954164 MARC
Denver, David. British general elections since 1964: diversity, dealignment, and disillusion, by David Denver and Mark Garnett. Oxford 224p bibl index ISBN 9780199673339 pbk, $34.95.

This book is a valuable addition to the literature because Denver (emer, Lancaster Univ.) and Garnett (Lancaster Univ.) provide a way to understand how British politics and elections have changed over time with the advent of television, the decline of major parties, the rise of new parties such as the Scottish National Party and UK Independence Party, and shifts in voting behavior.  The authors highlight comparisons between the elections of 2010 and 1964, when Harold Wilson led a modern campaign and began presidentializing the prime minister’s role.  Readers learn how voting is determined less by class and more by issues, and how issues—such as devolution and EU membership—have affected British politics for decades.  Chapters examine the rising importance of party leaders and how economic and demographic changes in Britain matter over time.  In light of endless campaigning and public relations consultants, the book could be more comparative since other industrialized democracies’ elections have been shaped by changing technology, transportation, and media sources.  The comprehensive synthesis of the literature, combined with language on how to interpret graphs and statistics, makes the book readable for undergraduates. 

--S. L. McMillan, Lander University

Summing Up: Highly recommended. Upper-division undergraduate, graduate, research, and professional collections.