CHOICE
connect
A division of the American Library Association
Editorial Offices: 575 Main Street, Suite 300, Middletown, CT 06457-3445
Phone: (860) 347-6933
Fax: (860) 704-0465
FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY
Please do not link to this page.
Cambridge University Press
The following review appeared in the November 2015 issue of CHOICE. The review is for your internal use only. Please review our Permission and Reprints Guidelines or email permissions@ala-choice.org.
Social & Behavioral Sciences
Political Science - Comparative Politics
This book is a welcome addition to further understanding “what drives individual citizens’ beliefs about the ethics and behavior of those holding public office.” Allen (Royal Holloway, Univ. of London, UK) and Birch (Univ. of Glasgow, Scotland) provide an empirically sophisticated readable study and readily address the “practical implications” of their study. They write in a language accessible to a wide audience and offer a history of the thinking on political ethics in British society, including an explanation of how Westminster politicians have evolved from the Burkean trustee model to the delegate model of representation. Chapters are methodologically rich (many focus groups and surveys over time with the same individuals) and provide comparisons of elites with the general public, who tend to view ethics in a wider sense of collective accountability and public discourse. The authors explain how the residue of mistrust from political scandals has affected political participation and citizens’ perceptions. This study is a reminder that an alienated public is poisonous for democracy. Thus, let readers hope that this work will be replicated by scholars studying other countries.
--S. L. McMillan, Lander University