CHOICE

connect

A publication of the Association of College and Research Libraries
A division of the American Library Association
Editorial Offices: 575 Main Street, Suite 300, Middletown, CT 06457-3445
Phone: (860) 347-6933
Fax: (860) 704-0465

FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

Please do not link to this page.

August 2016 Vol. 53 No. 12


Harvard Business Review Press


The following review appeared in the August 2016 issue of CHOICE. The review is for your internal use only. Please review our Permission and Reprints Guidelines or email permissions@ala-choice.org.

Social & Behavioral Sciences
Economics

53-5316
HC106
2015-43604 MARC
Cohen, Stephen S. Concrete economics: the Hamilton approach to economic growth and policy, by Stephen S. Cohen and J. Bradford DeLong. Harvard Business Review Press, 2016. 223p index afp ISBN 9781422189818, $28.00; ISBN 9781422189825 ebook, $28.00.

Concrete economics reflects the pragmatic policies responsible for American economic development from independence through the 1960s.  It is the embodiment of Alexander Hamilton’s very visible hand expanding the economic space necessary for markets to flourish.  It is the antithesis of the free market ideology that has increasingly dominated American economic policy over the last half century.  The authors note the irony of America’s economic competitors successfully adopting Hamiltonian policies as the American economy is hobbled by its newfound devotion to Smithian principles.  Worse still, as America’s manufacturing sector succumbs to foreign competition, the dubious activities of the burgeoning financial sector have managed to appropriate the lion’s share of America’s corporate profits.  In the global quest for economic growth, government policies strongly influence relative outcomes.  Absent effective American involvement, the global economy becomes a creature of foreign governmental design.  From Hamilton to Lincoln to FDR and Eisenhower, pragmatic governmental policies have successfully overcome America’s recurring economic dilemmas.  In its current dilemma, America now requires another economic redesign.  That redesign, the authors argue, should be the consequence of pragmatic policies, not laissez-faire theoretical abstractions.

--R. S. Hewett, Drake University

Summing Up: Highly recommended. Lower-division undergraduates through faculty.