CHOICE

connect

A publication of the Association of College and Research Libraries
A division of the American Library Association
Editorial Offices: 575 Main Street, Suite 300, Middletown, CT 06457-3445
Phone: (860) 347-6933
Fax: (860) 704-0465

FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

Please do not link to this page.

March 2022 Vol. 59 No. 7


Cornell University Press


The following review appeared in the March 2022 issue of CHOICE. The review is for your internal use only. Please review our Permission and Reprints Guidelines or email permissions@ala-choice.org.

Social & Behavioral Sciences
History, Geography & Area Studies - Ancient History

59-2052
DG317
CIP
Greenwood, David Neal. Julian and Christianity: revisiting the Constantinian revolution. Cornell, 2021. 192p bibl index ISBN 9781501755477, $55.00; ISBN 9781501755491 ebook, contact publisher for price.

This book seeks to overcome a traditional and popular chronological reconstruction of the fourth-century Roman Emperor Julian’s policies and writings, which assumed an initial phase of religious tolerance followed by increasing hostility toward Christianity. In its place, Greenwood (Univ. of Aberdeen, UK) presents his own reconstruction in which opposition to Christianity was a constant throughout Julian's reign, even if different strategies of deployment were used earlier on. From the beginning to the end of his short reign, Julian aimed to reverse the Constantinian revolution through a “recapitulation” of the Christian imperial ideology, correcting its errors rather than abolishing it altogether. Julian’s well-known identifications with Heracles and Asclepius are complicated by the fact that he represented these pagan deities in a Christlike manner, thus shaping his stance as both an anti-Christian and an anti-Christ. Not all readers will find Greenwood’s reconstruction equally compelling, especially since most recent historical work on Julian has sought to avoid explaining his religious thought as merely reactionary to Christianity. Nonetheless, several of his observations and arguments will surely extend and enrich the debate over one of Rome’s most controversial emperors.

--A. P. Johnson, Lee University

Summing Up: Recommended. Graduate students and faculty.